Obama, The Health Care Reform Bill, Birth Control and the Catholic Church

Category : American Politics, Religion, Women's Health

Whether you’re a Democrat or a Republican, this is a direct attack on women’s rights in the United States by the Catholic church.

Let’s be clear about what Obama is fighting for. This is the war between the Catholic church’s rights and women’s rights in the United States.

The Health Care Reform bill states that only religious organizations that primarily employ and serve their parishioners would be exempt from the requirement to provide insurance that covers birth control. Churches are exempt from providing insurance that includes birth control to women, but Catholic-run hospitals, agencies and colleges are not.

This mandate is very important for women in this country, and whether or not the Catholic church has the right to inflict their religion on women who are employed by them to serve the general population in Catholic organizations in the United States.

Obama believes that every woman should have access to birth control through the insurance provided by her employer. I agree wholeheartedly!

I find it fascinating to listen to all the other MEN who are weighing in on this issue – primarily the bishops and Republican candidates who are rallying to the side of the male dominated Catholic hierarchy rather than the women who be directly affected by this health mandate for women. As usual, they are distorting the facts. I can hear their arguments now, “How dare Obama attack the very fabric of the Catholic church!” Never mind the needs and rights of the women, they shouldn’t even have the right to vote let alone control their reproductive health! I mean, nobody would actually SAY that, but I’m confident that many of them think that way. Who do all these guys think they’re kidding? These aren’t necessarily Catholic women who we’re talking about; these women are hired under the clause that these organizations may not discriminate based on religion to begin with. Think about that. If these organizations can’t discriminate when they hire someone, what should give them the right to refuse to comply with other employer laws surrounding that employment? Oh it’s women, and the Catholic church is holding steadfast that they should be able to continue to refuse women fundamental health care rights because THEY don’t believe women should have those rights. Controlling women is nothing new for the Catholic church, but preserving the rights of women is the job of our represented officials - Obama, Democrats and Republicans not excluded.

If the Catholic organizations who serve and are staffed by the general population can hire outside of their religion, in fact, not be allowed to discriminate based on religion in their hiring process, why then should they be granted immunity from our other laws when it pertains directly to women’s right to control her own reproductive health care?

This is not a war perpetrated by Obama against the Catholic church, but rather it is a war perpetrated by the Catholic church against women who are employed by Catholic agencies, but who do not necessarily belong to or believe in the Catholic doctrine.

Komen, Planned Parenthood, Breast Cancer, Abortion and the Moral High Ground

Category : American Politics, Women's Health

The reasons ares simple: access to reproductive health care for low income women is still being debated and Karen Handel is still employed by Susan G. Komen, even if less empowered due to public outrage. Right wing anti-Planned Parenthood people are still angry with Komen for “caving” and so the struggle to protect the services at Planned Parenthood are front and center. The war is stronger than ever between the right-wingers and leftists regarding abortion. Somewhere in this mess, we all forgot about breast cancer. 

Komen really screwed up. Instead of people rallying to move forward for the sake of a cure for breast cancer, their Facebook page now has over 11,000 comments about them and the endless abortion arguments that have raged since abortions became legal. Misinformation about Planned Parenthood continues – some people on the right are angry because they don’t understand Planned Parenthood’s commitment to breast cancer. They don’t understand why Komen would fund an organization or specific clinic that does not have mammogram equipment, not realizing that not all breast exams start or result in mammograms. Sometimes Planned Parenthood and other doctors provide initial screenings and, when necessary, write prescriptions for women to receive this specialized care at mammograms centers. A prescription is required in order to receive a mammogram. Planned Parenthood also provides self-exam education.  

The grant money provided to Planned Parenthood addresses the breast health care needs of 170,000 of Planned Parenthood’s 700,000 breast health care recipients, and is part of Komen’s mission to treat and eventually cure breast cancer and the grants they provide to Planned Parenthood. The partnership should continue, and the goals should be clear. But we forgot. We’re angry about abortions! 

Making the fight against breast cancer the new podium to grandstand about abortions spells disaster no matter which side of the fence you’re on. Refusing services or money to help women receive these important services seems paramount to throwing the baby out with the bath water. Is anyone still interested in finding a cure for breast cancer? Is it morally right or wrong to provide funding to women who receive breast health care in a clinic that also performs abortions? What is the moral high ground in this situation? 

A breast cancer fundraising group dedicated to finding a cure should also contribute money to help low-income women who are dealing with breast cancer now. I agree that the funds should be earmarked specifically for breast health care, and that should be the end of the discussion. All other discussions take away from the mission of saving lives. 

Personally I have always admired the astounding fund-raising efforts by Susan G. Komen for the Cure. I see their pink ribbons on a variety of products, and I’ve always made the effort to purchase those products because several women in my life have dealt with breast cancer. In my mind, each purchase, each donation was a tip to women and their fight to survive. This message must be reinstated or the efforts to find a cure will forever be stunted. Susan G. Komen should continue to provide grant money to any agency who performs breast screenings and other breast care treatment for women who could not otherwise afford such care. Komen needs to find its footing and get their message out loud and clear so that the discussion about abortion simply has no room to fester and grow like the cancer that is currently eroding what was once Komen’s rock-solid foundation.