Santorum, Planned Parenthood and Prop 8 – A Mixed Message in the US

Category : American Politics, Gay Rights, Women's Health

Santorum had a full sweep of three states in the race for the presidential Republican nomination – Minnesota, Missouri and Colorado. Not only is he against abortion, a standard Republican platform, he’s also against birth control and gay marriage. So what are we to take away from a landmark day like yesterday, when a man like Santorum wins three states, Susan G. Komen for the Cure, Karen Handel resigns over a scandal she waged against Planned Parenthood and a Californian court upholds that the gay marriage bill, Proposition 8 is unconstitutional for discriminating against gays and lesbians?

Let’s look a little further…

Rick Santorum – Republican Presidential Candidate For White Straight Men and Nobody Else – Winner of  3 States in One Day

Santorum is the same man who lost his 2006 Senate bid for reelection by a landslide 18 points in Pennsylvania for his polarizing views that alienated women and those in the gay and lesbian community. That’s quite a lot of people.

He condemned couples who live together without being married, and criticized women for working outside of the home, pointing to “radical feminism” as the primary culprit. Radical feminism, by the way, is the notion that women are people too. That’s really all it is. Kinda crazy, huh? It makes me concerned for his wife and daughters who are probably taught that it is best to leave the big decisions for the man in the house and not use their own brains. Forget the abortion debate, Santorum goes straight for the jugular in that he doesn’t believe that women should use or have access to birth control. He is completely and utterly against most of the services that Planned Parenthood is known for. His notions date so far back to women’s suffrage that I can’t help but wonder if he also thinks that women shouldn’t have the right to vote. There is no mistaking that for women, Santorum is a dangerous guy whose goals are to eliminate as many of our rights as he possibly can.

Santorum is not terribly likable by the gay and lesbian community either. He flatly opposes legalized gay marriage, as do many conservatives. However, he went one step further, citing gay marriage could result in legal protections for polygamy, incest and bestiality. Yeah, bestiality. Clearly he is out of touch, but it does leave one to wonder what he does in his own bedroom.

Karen Handel’s Lost War Against Planned Parenthood

Planned Parenthood came under attack this past week when Susan G. Komen for the Cure announced they were going to de-fund Planned Parenthood’s breast screening program, which they’ve contributed to for the past 20 years. Although Komen never admitted that the decision was political, there was never a doubt in the public eye, for those who support the choice to have abortion or those who do not. I’m sure Komen was surprised to find themselves the focus of intense public outrage, losing supporters in record numbers, while Planned Parenthood received an unexpected $3 million windfall from thousands of women who had received a variety of services from them, from breast screenings to reproductive health care when they were unable to afford it themselves. Tens of thousands of comments lit up Komen’s Facebook page condemning them for politicizing women’s heallh care. Feeling betrayed, long-time Komen supporters stated that they were cutting up their pink ribbons and discarding everything pink, refusing to purchase anything that would provide Komen with more funds to achive their new political agenda. Many believed that Komen’s recent VP Karen Handel was behind the unexpected decision,. Handel lost her 2010 bid for Georgia Governor on the platform of being against and planning to defund and dismantel Planned Parenthood. The Huffington Post stated that they have seen internal communication from Komen executives that supports the accusation that Handel instigated and helped plan the move to stop funding breast cancer screenings for low-income women at Planned Parenthood. After Komen recinded its decision, the public demanded Handel’s resignation, which came yesterday. The message was loud and clear, “Don’t politicize women’s health.” So how does a guy like Rick Santorum win on the same day that Handel hands over her resignation?

The Legal Right to Marry is Gaining Momentum for Gays and Lesbians

The decision to reject Proposition 8 was upheld by California’s 9th District Court as unconstitutional, citing that it was discriminatory against gays and lesbians. It is expected that proponents of the anti-gay bill will appeal yesterday’s latest ruling, sending it next to the Supreme Court for a final ruling.

Those in favor of the bill believe that marriage should only be between opposite-sex couples and feel that providing gays and lesbians with the same rights diminishes the very constition of marriage. Those who oppose the bill say that it discriminates against gays and Lesbians in fundamental ways, that their partners are not recognized in many legal and socially situations – from visiting partners in hospital emergency rooms to property rights after death to the privilege of not being required to testify against his or her spouse in any proceeding. Gay rights activists believe that states must recognize their civil unions and grant them the same rights as opposite-sex couples.

 So in a day and age where it seems like women have made a very clear statement on their views about contraception and health care relating specifically to themselves, where gays and lesbians are one step closer to legalized marriage, a man like Rick Santorum who adamantly opposes all of the aforementioned is nominated for the Rupublican Presidential candidate in three state elections on the very same day.

Just like the middle class is eroding and leaving us with two distinct groups in the US – the rich and the poor, so too are our views polorizing us as a nation, where some are prepared to wage attack on the fundamental rights that have taken years to achieve.

In our world where we have so much to think about, together as a nation - war, education, the economy, jobs, international relations - it’s a wonder that anyone has the energy, desire or time to spend diminishing the rights of others to make themselves and their narrow, sexist, biggoted, and religious views the law of this land, the United States of America.

Komen, Planned Parenthood, Breast Cancer, Abortion and the Moral High Ground

Category : American Politics, Women's Health

The reasons ares simple: access to reproductive health care for low income women is still being debated and Karen Handel is still employed by Susan G. Komen, even if less empowered due to public outrage. Right wing anti-Planned Parenthood people are still angry with Komen for “caving” and so the struggle to protect the services at Planned Parenthood are front and center. The war is stronger than ever between the right-wingers and leftists regarding abortion. Somewhere in this mess, we all forgot about breast cancer. 

Komen really screwed up. Instead of people rallying to move forward for the sake of a cure for breast cancer, their Facebook page now has over 11,000 comments about them and the endless abortion arguments that have raged since abortions became legal. Misinformation about Planned Parenthood continues – some people on the right are angry because they don’t understand Planned Parenthood’s commitment to breast cancer. They don’t understand why Komen would fund an organization or specific clinic that does not have mammogram equipment, not realizing that not all breast exams start or result in mammograms. Sometimes Planned Parenthood and other doctors provide initial screenings and, when necessary, write prescriptions for women to receive this specialized care at mammograms centers. A prescription is required in order to receive a mammogram. Planned Parenthood also provides self-exam education.  

The grant money provided to Planned Parenthood addresses the breast health care needs of 170,000 of Planned Parenthood’s 700,000 breast health care recipients, and is part of Komen’s mission to treat and eventually cure breast cancer and the grants they provide to Planned Parenthood. The partnership should continue, and the goals should be clear. But we forgot. We’re angry about abortions! 

Making the fight against breast cancer the new podium to grandstand about abortions spells disaster no matter which side of the fence you’re on. Refusing services or money to help women receive these important services seems paramount to throwing the baby out with the bath water. Is anyone still interested in finding a cure for breast cancer? Is it morally right or wrong to provide funding to women who receive breast health care in a clinic that also performs abortions? What is the moral high ground in this situation? 

A breast cancer fundraising group dedicated to finding a cure should also contribute money to help low-income women who are dealing with breast cancer now. I agree that the funds should be earmarked specifically for breast health care, and that should be the end of the discussion. All other discussions take away from the mission of saving lives. 

Personally I have always admired the astounding fund-raising efforts by Susan G. Komen for the Cure. I see their pink ribbons on a variety of products, and I’ve always made the effort to purchase those products because several women in my life have dealt with breast cancer. In my mind, each purchase, each donation was a tip to women and their fight to survive. This message must be reinstated or the efforts to find a cure will forever be stunted. Susan G. Komen should continue to provide grant money to any agency who performs breast screenings and other breast care treatment for women who could not otherwise afford such care. Komen needs to find its footing and get their message out loud and clear so that the discussion about abortion simply has no room to fester and grow like the cancer that is currently eroding what was once Komen’s rock-solid foundation.